<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Conversion Virtually Ugly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/</link>
	<description>A Technology Crow in search of Bright Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VPC to VMWare with sysprep &#171; c# to javascript, actionscript</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/#comment-186091</link>
		<dc:creator>VPC to VMWare with sysprep &#171; c# to javascript, actionscript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/#comment-186091</guid>
		<description>[...] Another take on this. And here.   Comments (1)   LikeBe the first to like this post.1 Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another take on this. And here.   Comments (1)   LikeBe the first to like this post.1 Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Fusion 2 Beta &#187; Solo Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/#comment-36680</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Fusion 2 Beta &#187; Solo Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/01/02/883/#comment-36680</guid>
		<description>[...] image to a VMware image to use the Microsoft IE 6 (or IE7) virtual machine. It was a debacle (see Virtual Conversion Virtually Ugly for more on that). So now I&#8217;m wondering if that conversion will work better with this new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] image to a VMware image to use the Microsoft IE 6 (or IE7) virtual machine. It was a debacle (see Virtual Conversion Virtually Ugly for more on that). So now I&#8217;m wondering if that conversion will work better with this new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

