<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defensio Counts Differently Than I Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/</link>
	<description>A Technology Crow in search of Bright Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:03:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17039</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17039</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s some numbers from this morning.

I was at 1474 Total Spam.

Next time I checked, Defensio had 10.
Total Spam was now at 1488 (4 extra).

Next time I checked, Defensio had 8.
Total Spam was now at 1498.

This last one is interesting though -- Defensio showed 9. Total spam now at 1503.  Some adjustments going on?

*shrug* As long as it keeps blocking spam, it&#039;s all good.  Accuracy is up to 98.6% and climbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s some numbers from this morning.</p>
<p>I was at 1474 Total Spam.</p>
<p>Next time I checked, Defensio had 10.<br />
Total Spam was now at 1488 (4 extra).</p>
<p>Next time I checked, Defensio had 8.<br />
Total Spam was now at 1498.</p>
<p>This last one is interesting though &#8212; Defensio showed 9. Total spam now at 1503.  Some adjustments going on?</p>
<p>*shrug* As long as it keeps blocking spam, it&#8217;s all good.  Accuracy is up to 98.6% and climbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Mercier</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17018</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Mercier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17018</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Fair enough!  I personally always read the FAQ before installing stuff...*cough*cough*! ;-)

Let me know if you still see that odd spam count behavior.  We never ran into that issue and if there&#039;s indeed something wrong, we&#039;ll make sure to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Fair enough!  I personally always read the FAQ before installing stuff&#8230;*cough*cough*! <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Let me know if you still see that odd spam count behavior.  We never ran into that issue and if there&#8217;s indeed something wrong, we&#8217;ll make sure to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17017</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17017</guid>
		<description>Hi Carl - yep, latest version (just updated a couple nights ago).

And yeah, I read the FAQ -- that&#039;s why you&#039;ll see me mention I disabled Bad Behavior. I don&#039;t tend to read FAQ&#039;s until I... err... well, until I have &lt;strong&gt;Questions&lt;/strong&gt;. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carl &#8211; yep, latest version (just updated a couple nights ago).</p>
<p>And yeah, I read the FAQ &#8212; that&#8217;s why you&#8217;ll see me mention I disabled Bad Behavior. I don&#8217;t tend to read FAQ&#8217;s until I&#8230; err&#8230; well, until I have <strong>Questions</strong>. <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Mercier</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17014</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Mercier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17014</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot... using Defensio standalone will indeed help its accuracy a whole lot.  That&#039;s what we say in the FAQ and in the readme file, but I guess nobody&#039;s reading those after all ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot&#8230; using Defensio standalone will indeed help its accuracy a whole lot.  That&#8217;s what we say in the FAQ and in the readme file, but I guess nobody&#8217;s reading those after all <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Mercier</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17013</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Mercier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17013</guid>
		<description>Chris,

What Adam said totally makes sense, I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t have that box checked.  Can you make sure you&#039;re using the latest version of the Wordpress plugin please?

The drop in the number of spam indeed happens when you retrain.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>What Adam said totally makes sense, I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t have that box checked.  Can you make sure you&#8217;re using the latest version of the Wordpress plugin please?</p>
<p>The drop in the number of spam indeed happens when you retrain.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17000</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-17000</guid>
		<description>nope, mine rises fairly steadily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope, mine rises fairly steadily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-16945</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/11/25/defensio-counts-differently-than-i-do/#comment-16945</guid>
		<description>That would make sense, but alas... the box is not checked.

And again, it isn&#039;t actually causing me any problems. I just find it odd.

You&#039;re using Defensio as well? Did you, by chance, see a similar drop in counted spam around that same time frame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would make sense, but alas&#8230; the box is not checked.</p>
<p>And again, it isn&#8217;t actually causing me any problems. I just find it odd.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re using Defensio as well? Did you, by chance, see a similar drop in counted spam around that same time frame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
