<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Google Apps Always Lag Behind?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/</link>
	<description>A Technology Crow in search of Bright Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:01:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Continuing the Perfect Start Page Quest &#187; Solo Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-28066</link>
		<dc:creator>Continuing the Perfect Start Page Quest &#187; Solo Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-28066</guid>
		<description>[...] the same company! And don&#8217;t even get me started about the Google Apps start page (blech!). That&#8217;s not a valid alternative. I thought maybe this feed idea would get the job done, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the same company! And don&#8217;t even get me started about the Google Apps start page (blech!). That&#8217;s not a valid alternative. I thought maybe this feed idea would get the job done, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18475</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18475</guid>
		<description>Ok, Vox and Nathan... even if you guys are wrong it sure makes sense.  I&#039;ll play along with your rationalizations.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, Vox and Nathan&#8230; even if you guys are wrong it sure makes sense.  I&#8217;ll play along with your rationalizations.  <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18425</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18425</guid>
		<description>I agree with Vox. i think the free users are doing final beta testing. They guarantee 99.9% uptime, so I think they are being cautious before messing with paying customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Vox. i think the free users are doing final beta testing. They guarantee 99.9% uptime, so I think they are being cautious before messing with paying customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vox</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18387</link>
		<dc:creator>Vox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18387</guid>
		<description>I think the idea is pretty much in the line of &quot;let&#039;s get the freebie people test stuff before we break it for the paying customers&quot;...I know I&#039;d do it that way, for that reason.

And yes, I&#039;ve just been busy as all hell, but that&#039;s life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea is pretty much in the line of &#8220;let&#8217;s get the freebie people test stuff before we break it for the paying customers&#8221;&#8230;I know I&#8217;d do it that way, for that reason.</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;ve just been busy as all hell, but that&#8217;s life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18323</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18323</guid>
		<description>Rich!

I *just* saw the AIM blog posting, but haven&#039;t had a chance to find out if I can do it from GApps yet (gaps!  oh sweet nickname, come to papa)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich!</p>
<p>I *just* saw the AIM blog posting, but haven&#8217;t had a chance to find out if I can do it from GApps yet (gaps!  oh sweet nickname, come to papa)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich G.</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18321</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2007/12/04/will-google-apps-always-lag-behind/#comment-18321</guid>
		<description>You completely failed to mention that my gtalk blurb keeps telling me it can chat with AIM. Does your paid for version do that? 

Yeah. I know. I just hadn&#039;t commented in a while is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You completely failed to mention that my gtalk blurb keeps telling me it can chat with AIM. Does your paid for version do that? </p>
<p>Yeah. I know. I just hadn&#8217;t commented in a while is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
