<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New FolderShare has No Love for Windows 2000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/</link>
	<description>A Technology Crow in search of Bright Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:55:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-47151</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-47151</guid>
		<description>@Dan

Found this link:

http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,62602/description.html

Lists Windows 2000 and is an older version, but I haven&#039;t tested it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan</p>
<p>Found this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,62602/description.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,62602/description.html</a></p>
<p>Lists Windows 2000 and is an older version, but I haven&#8217;t tested it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-43456</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-43456</guid>
		<description>So does anyone know where I can get a copy of the older client for Win2K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does anyone know where I can get a copy of the older client for Win2K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sun</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-36584</link>
		<dc:creator>sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-36584</guid>
		<description>Just hope you never have to exit out of FolderShare. When FolderShare restarts, it&#039;ll prompt you to upgrade at which time your client will no longer work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hope you never have to exit out of FolderShare. When FolderShare restarts, it&#8217;ll prompt you to upgrade at which time your client will no longer work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another FolderShare Release &#8212; Getting Scared &#187; Solo Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-34388</link>
		<dc:creator>Another FolderShare Release &#8212; Getting Scared &#187; Solo Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-34388</guid>
		<description>[...] released a new beta release of the FolderShare client. I was excited until I realized there was no support for Windows 2000. That made me nervous, but I had hoped it wasn&#8217;t a big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] released a new beta release of the FolderShare client. I was excited until I realized there was no support for Windows 2000. That made me nervous, but I had hoped it wasn&#8217;t a big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Installer CleanUp Utility to the Rescue &#187; Solo Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30893</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Installer CleanUp Utility to the Rescue &#187; Solo Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30893</guid>
		<description>[...] continued to update FolderShare installs today and ran into a new wrinkle with my home XP desktop. While trying to upgrade the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continued to update FolderShare installs today and ran into a new wrinkle with my home XP desktop. While trying to upgrade the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30788</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30788</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich - it rocks my Vista and Win2003 machines too :-)  I like it.  

In fact, I should&#039;ve mentioned in the article that I REALLY like that it is fewer clicks to get to the activity monitor now.

@Andrew - I wish I had your optimism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich &#8211; it rocks my Vista and Win2003 machines too <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I like it.  </p>
<p>In fact, I should&#8217;ve mentioned in the article that I REALLY like that it is fewer clicks to get to the activity monitor now.</p>
<p>@Andrew &#8211; I wish I had your optimism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30781</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/03/25/new-foldershare-has-no-love-for-windows-2000/#comment-30781</guid>
		<description>Im suprised also that it will not support windows 2000 servers. But in saying that it does look promising. And in reply to Rich G&#039;s comment, i also have a Macbook and have been using it and the results have been very good so far. Im sure they will update this so it works better will all different servers in the near future.

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im suprised also that it will not support windows 2000 servers. But in saying that it does look promising. And in reply to Rich G&#8217;s comment, i also have a Macbook and have been using it and the results have been very good so far. Im sure they will update this so it works better will all different servers in the near future.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
