<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Machine? Try antiX Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/</link>
	<description>A Technology Crow in search of Bright Shiny Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:01:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/#comment-79170</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-79170</guid>
		<description>Well OK then, I&#039;ll give it a shot. Downloading the ISO now and hopefully will have some time over the holidays to play around.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well OK then, I&#8217;ll give it a shot. Downloading the ISO now and hopefully will have some time over the holidays to play around.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cotton</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/#comment-79165</link>
		<dc:creator>cotton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-79165</guid>
		<description>Arch will work fine on Pentium 2 &amp; 3 machines - they&#039;re i686 compatible (but Pentiums are not).

See the discussion at http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=49875

Once you try Arch, you&#039;ll never look for another distro!

Have fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arch will work fine on Pentium 2 &amp; 3 machines &#8211; they&#8217;re i686 compatible (but Pentiums are not).</p>
<p>See the discussion at <a href="http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=49875" rel="nofollow">http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=49875</a></p>
<p>Once you try Arch, you&#8217;ll never look for another distro!</p>
<p>Have fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/#comment-75673</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-75673</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan - OK, you&#039;re the second person to suggest that I look at at Arch Linux. However, when I go there I see this on the front page:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Currently we have official packages optimized for the i686 and x86-64 architectures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That won&#039;t go to far with my old pentium 2 and 3 machines! :-)  Am I missing something or looking in the wrong spot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan &#8211; OK, you&#8217;re the second person to suggest that I look at at Arch Linux. However, when I go there I see this on the front page:</p>
<blockquote><p>Currently we have official packages optimized for the i686 and x86-64 architectures.</p></blockquote>
<p>That won&#8217;t go to far with my old pentium 2 and 3 machines! <img src='http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Am I missing something or looking in the wrong spot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/#comment-75597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-75597</guid>
		<description>I also like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archlinux.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Arch linux&lt;/a&gt; for this application (specifically crafted for x86 architecture), but it&#039;s up there with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gentoo.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gentoo&lt;/a&gt; in difficulty to install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like <a href="http://www.archlinux.org/" rel="nofollow">Arch linux</a> for this application (specifically crafted for x86 architecture), but it&#8217;s up there with <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/" rel="nofollow">Gentoo</a> in difficulty to install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Windows Computer? Try K-Meleon &#187; Solo Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/2008/11/13/old-machine-try-antix-linux/#comment-75063</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Windows Computer? Try K-Meleon &#187; Solo Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solo-technology.com/blog/?p=2454#comment-75063</guid>
		<description>[...] once again found myself running Windows 2000 on my old P2 ThinkPad.  I&#8217;d been most recently running antiX Linux on it, but for a variety of vague reasons decided to go back to Win2K once [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] once again found myself running Windows 2000 on my old P2 ThinkPad.  I&#8217;d been most recently running antiX Linux on it, but for a variety of vague reasons decided to go back to Win2K once [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
